Clinical decision support

Guidelines & calculators

Practice guidelines and risk calculators

Third-party guidelines and prediction tools relevant to IBD-unclassified, each independently verified against PubMed. These are external documents and tools — linked, not reproduced, and not evidence-gated by this site.

Read the access and validation labels. Very few published IBD prediction tools are simultaneously a live free calculator, externally validated, and validated for the decision you are about to make. Where a tool is formula-only, or was validated only in its derivation cohort, that is stated rather than hidden behind a link. 4 further item(s) found by this review are withheld pending clinician sign-off rather than published unverified.

Practice guidelines

Risk calculators and prediction tools

  • Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) formula only — no calculatornot validated18-point composite of clinical symptoms, endoscopic appearance and acute histologic inflammation; score ≥7 defines pouchitis. The instrument that operationally defines the commonest pouch outcome measured in IBDu series. · PMID 8170189 Note: NOT a validated instrument. Derived in 1994 on 25 patients total (10 with pouchitis, 15 controls). A 2022 systematic review of 21 operating-property studies (PMID 34180986) concluded no pouchitis index is fully valid, reliable or responsive; PDAI inter-rater reliability was only fair-to-moderate (kappa 0.44) and clinical subscores correlate poorly with endoscopic/histologic subscores. A separate study found antibiotics benefit many symptomatic patients scoring <7, so the diagnostic threshold misses treatment-responders. There is no official web calculator — no MDCalc entry exists; it must be scored by hand from the published table, and it requires biopsy histology, so it is not a bedside tool.
  • Modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) formula only — no calculatornot validatedPDAI with the histology subscore dropped (clinical + endoscopic only); score ≥5 defines pouchitis. The practical version usable at the time of pouchoscopy without waiting for pathology. · PMID 12794576 Note: Shares the PDAI's validation problem and is arguably weaker: inter-rater reliability kappa 0.389, i.e. lower than the parent index. Derived by excluding patients with chronic refractory pouchitis AND patients with Crohn's disease — precisely the populations an IBDu pouch is most likely to become, so its performance in IBDu is untested. Reported sensitivity/specificity are against the unvalidated PDAI as reference standard, not against an independent gold standard.